Silent Hill Community • View topic - [News] Behind The Scenes

Yeah, she's coming, but still gonna take a while...

Adelaide Clemens is sooo cute as Heather...

I'd found this videos on youtube, behind scenes and interviews. Not sure about the date, it seams recent. Enjoy, as waiting for a real trailer...

Easter eggs? Dunno, but there is rabbits...

Thanks for posting!

No matter how the film turns out, I love the fact that the director behind Revelations has such passion for the games. From his blog I think it's easy to see that he understands the elements that make Silent Hill what it is and how to combine them into a film while treating the source material respectfully. I also can't wait to see Adelaide in action as Heather!

I can hardly wait for them to turn the trailer loose.

I think Adelaide Clemens is just really cute altogether. I'm not exactly a person who awes over attractive celebrities (let alone even cares), but she easily has one of the cutest faces I've ever seen in a person. You can't help but like that smile. But even if the movie does suck, hopefully it will let her get a foot in the door and appear in more prominent roles in North American films. She kinda fits in with Heather in that she's not exactly this slutty bombshell perfection piece with boobs, lips, and tail busting out all the over the place, but she's not ugly either. Just looks like a typical young person.

This film is a big opportunity for both Clemens and Basset. His face will be most of the time big on the screen - can she handle? Can he manage? We will have to wait to find out. I'm happy with we already got so far.

I don't know why the first one says 2012, both those videos came out in mid 2011.

I'd try to found the real date, but got out of time. Youtube got a lot of trash and re-posted videos, also THAT trailer and the "full movie"...

woooo that' so much for me thank you !!*O* i will watch the vids for later

thanks again~~:)

Honestly, I was hoping they'd have less monsters from SH2 and more from 3. Insane cancer, amirite?

I venture to assert that most of this community doesn't know what PH is doing in this movie. In the first one we were lucky because PH were lost in the city but sill make a great effect, great horror scenes. I hope PH still keep lucky, but if I could have said one thing to Basset: - forget about PH, SH2 and SH1, there is enough cool monsters in SH3 and a great story ready do adapt.

I don't think PH's presence in the films will ever sit well with me but I understand why he has to be in this one, since they shoehorned him into the first they will have to include him again for continuity.. or some other purpose MJB has in mind?

Also Xuch, I was hoping for an Insane Cancer in this film over all the other monsters. I wanna see one in there so bad!

Insane Cancers would be amazing, since they were the scariest monsters for me in when I first played SH3.

I am really getting oddly excited about SH: Revelations (even if I am hearing rumors that seriously freak me out for a certain character) which is a surprise to me. I am not one of those fans that vehemently hates the first movie, but I was rather disappointed by it. This one is getting me pretty excited. Although I wonder, will it be released ONLY in 3D? I don't have a 3D theater in my town and on top of that, I can't watch 3D. I get really bad vertigo from it. :/

A scene where they first encounter a insane cancer and laugh. Then it runs at them, would be scary.

MoonBlade wrote:Insane Cancers would be amazing, since they were the scariest monsters for me in when I first played SH3.

I am really getting oddly excited about SH: Revelations (even if I am hearing rumors that seriously freak me out for a certain character) which is a surprise to me. I am not one of those fans that vehemently hates the first movie, but I was rather disappointed by it. This one is getting me pretty excited. Although I wonder, will it be released ONLY in 3D? I don't have a 3D theater in my town and on top of that, I can't watch 3D. I get really bad vertigo from it. :/

Doubtful. I've never heard of a film releasing solely in 3D.

Question, though: how much experience have you had with 3D? I know for a lot of people it's just that they need to get used to it, like a new glasses prescription; it only took maybe 5 hours or so of playing my 3DS for my head to adjust.

Not much, honestly. I've been to a few IMAX theaters, but I've not watched anything in 3D over the past 5 years or so because previously every time experienced really bad vertigo. I have heard from a lot of people that 3D has become more polished over the past 2-3 years, but I am a bit of a pessimist and I'll admit it.

Maybe I'll get back into 3D eventually, but I'd rather just watch 2D.

It's doubtful Revelation will release only in 3D, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if it was very close to it. 3D films with not so large audiences (for example, Underworld 4) have been opening with only 1-2 2D showings a day, no matter how large the theater, in an effort to force viewers to pay for 3D tickets. That's probably what Revelation will do as well.

*GROAN*
This is why I've turned from theaters completely and use my potential theater money for Netflix or RedBox. :c

The 3D is a fad I wish would die off already. It's just a few more dollars I could use to buy candy at a gas station to munch on for the movie instead of some gimmick I don't care about. The only time I've been to a 3D showing was for Toy Story 3 and only because that one was the only showing available at the time I went to see the movie.

Volodislavu wrote:The 3D is a fad I wish would die off already. It's just a few more dollars I could use to buy candy at a gas station to munch on for the movie instead of some gimmick I don't care about. The only time I've been to a 3D showing was for Toy Story 3 and only because that one was the only showing available at the time I went to see the movie.

I've seen a lot of movies in 3D and they all sucked. Except for Avatar, that is the best and only real use of 3D technology I've seen. I really don't understand the 3D hype, it really is essentially just extra money charged for a pair of 3D glasses and some weak extra effects.

Also I love how I'm not the only person who sneaks candy into theaters from gas stations. My mom takes it to a whole other level though, we went to see The Hunger Games together a few months ago and she smuggled in a giant sandwich from Subway in her oversized purse.

I didn't even like it in Avatar. But the derivative story in Avatar was my primary issue. It was just so boring that Avatar was the first film in recent memory I was strongly considering walking out on. I know it screams "oh, you're saying that because it's popular", but that's how I was really feeling. It just didn't entertain me at all. But at least it had Sigourney Weaver in it. Plus, it's kind of annoying how the time I did watch Toy Story 3 in 3D, they had cleaned the glasses after a previous audience had already used them and my pair was still wet.

And yeah, I always sneak a small bottle drink and candy into a theater when I have a chance. No way in hell I'll ever purchase foot at the theater with the high prices they give. For the drink, I just place it inside my pants protruding above the waistband a bit covered by my shirt. Doesn't stick out like one would think, and even it did I highly doubt the mostly teenage staff at my theater would care. My mom and sister always did the same thing. Smuggling stuff in their purses.

Volodislavu wrote:Plus, it's kind of annoying how the time I did watch Toy Story 3 in 3D, they had cleaned the glasses after a previous audience had already used them and my pair was still wet.

They make you guys re-use 3D glasses? I've never been to a theater that did that. Frankly I wouldn't want a used pair, even if they do clean them.

[News] Behind The Scenes

Who is online